Permit me to start this by saying that I’ve been a little leery about bringing to print some things concerning these guys that maybe could be working better for them. I’ve spoken with, or have written, to some of you with ideas and questions, but I haven’t really written in public about them for fear that they might be misunderstood or misinterpreted, and get someone angry in the C&J camp.
So please let me make this clear – these are my hopefully very objective thoughts about how we all might help improve, and better, and expand their popularity and salability. I’m not a pro at this, this is not personal (this is about tools, and maybe how to use them effectively), feel free to comment, and know that, come what may, I will be a fan regardless. Well, you know, as long as they continue to not stink. Anyway, it would be cool if we come up with something, and still cool to simply be thinking about it, but do realize that in the end, perhaps this is just meaningless conversation :).
Back to the brand awareness thing one more time. Again, my perspective.
I spent sometime this morning (as you know, I’m one of the millions of long term unemployed, and did the following after several hours of a daily job search) looking into the Chad & Jeremy brand presence on the web. I mentioned yesterday that they were involved with Twitter, MySpace, Facebook, and Yahoo’s news groups, as well as an official web site and store.
These are all my findings, opinions, guesses, etc., so please if you note factual errors, keep them to yourselves. No, seriously, let me know if I’ve gone terribly awry factually. Some of this is easy, some takes some faith.
So, Twitter. I see that their (Firstly, I don’t know if they do it or have someone do it for them. I think what would make this work best for them is if they were actually involved, but I don’t know for certain if they are or not) first tweet was on 5/4/09. To today, there have been 22 of them, or a little more than 1 per week. They have 51 people following them, and they do not follow anyone.
Here’s where I go off into assumption land. I heard them first announce their Twitter involvement on 5/2 in LI. It is, in fact, at the beginning of one of the videos I’ve posted. So they have had 7 shows since that time, through yesterday. Let’s say, and I don’t know if this is true, that they have announced that they are on their web site, MySpace, Facebook, and Twitter at each show, which will seat, on average between 200 and 400 people. That’s 7 shows times my own rough guess of 300 people per, to give us 2100 people getting the word about Twitter.
Agreeably, I’ve made a bunch of assumptions, but can we agree that a bunch of people now know about it? Yet a mere 51 people have made the effort to follow them. And why is that number only 51? Is it perhaps that their audience just isn’t into Twitter for whatever reason? Is it the lack of tweets? Is it tweet content? Obviously, I don’t know. And maybe it’s me, and maybe it’s their sense of humor, but also notice in the aforementioned video that they make the comment, after telling the audience that they were now on Twitter, that if you wanted to have a conversation with them, they were there, they were virtual:). So, why wouldn’t you follow them?
Well, I may be gullible, and I do know that 140 characters do not make for a good conversation, but I had thought that we might at least be seeing the first step into some real back and forth interaction, which in turn, I thought, might have lead to some word of mouth (at least) increase in interest, fan base, and also perhaps, innovation. And that has not yet taken place.
So, what is it with Twitter, is the cause there lost? Have they begrudgingly agreed to have their names on Twitter because it was thought as the right thing to do in “today’s world,” or is there a commitment to use it for stuff other than “We’re busy in the studio”? I will say that the release of the live cut from Mohegan Sun was a great idea, and hopefully all 51 people enjoyed the download. The skeptic in me says that they might have announced that release on all of their web things so more could have taken advantage of it, but never mind :). And if you’re just now hearing about it, grab it while you can at www.twitter.com\chadandjeremy , from 6/6/09.
And before you all get up in arms, you all should know that I continue to hope that they will continue to prosper, record, and have their popularity grow to be as big as they want it to be. So let’s build on those 51 followers. For one thing, you never know if there’ll be another live song down the road sometime.
In summary, they’ve got web presence. They use Twitter. Not many follow. How do we help with that?
Next time, MySpace, and how to nurture that inner 15 year old in all of us.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Tony, I completely agree about the branding issue. Whenever I mention Chad & Jeremy to anyone they ask "oh, what songs did they do?" As soon as I name songs, the recognition is there and usually a positive reaction, too. When I hear talk of Twitter, most in our age group remark they have no use for it, but Chad & Jeremy do have younger fans, as well. Maybe the broadcast documentary and DVD will help make the brand connection for a larger group. Another thought on the brand issue that I have had for a long while, they are so versatile and not tied to one "sound" - I think that makes them less identifiable for the casual listener although infinitely more interesting and enjoyable for us fans. Sure would like to see more recognition for them. Thank you, Tony!
ReplyDeleteTony -- good post. The critical thing about all social media, including Twitter, FaceBook, MySpace, etc., is that they are first and foremost about relationships. You don't build relationships with 22 tweets in four months. And Twitter and Facebook are increasingly skewed to an older crowd -- our kids want to stick with IPhones and text messages.
ReplyDeleteAnd it's amazing what you can do with a 140-character post -- last week, two friends I've never met and I did a poetry jam for an hour -- all on Twitter. More can be done with things like Facebook, MySpace and the Yahoo message board.
The point here is, the fan base can be broadened pretty dramatically through using Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, YouTube, Yahoo board, web sites, possibly an email newsletter and this blog. It takes a plan and some work, and it won't happen overnight. But it can happen. The company I work for went from zero to 2500 followers in five months, without using any of the bot services that are so obnoxious, and I do think that C&J would have a lot more appeal to the public.
I agree, Twitter is about relationships. Of course, to build relationships you must invest time. Investing time in a technology that none of my friend (potential fans) cares to use makes building a network an uphill battle.
ReplyDeleteCreating a network of strangers does include some risk, and that, too, is a barrier.
Thougts from Dxzenia
How to enlarge the network? Well, 50 people all need to have at least 1 person they can "tweet" and then each of 50 tweets needs to be re-tweeted . . . etc.
C&J did not mention Twitter from the stage at the Iron Horse show -- so another factor is whether they or their groundcrew have the time to spend on a low-return technology.
I, for one, enjoy the Twitter surprises, but admit, I'm not connected enough or Twitter-savvy enough to make it work for them.
E-mail, Yahoo, MySpace are my main connections.